Tuesday, May 16, 2006
Day 106 - What Gafni Can Learn From Houellebecq

[Note: as it is with the rest of this blog, the opinions expressed here are mine and mine alone.]
So. Rabbi Marc Gafni has just had three allegations of sexual misconduct made against him by members of his spiritual community, Bayit Chadash. Ken Wilber has made a statement. Other bloggers have made statements. Gafni himself has made a statement (scroll down to read it). What else is there to say?
Given that I myself fall quite short of reaching sainthood anytime soon, I've no moral high horse to climb upon to denounce Gafni. What he's been accused of sucks, of course, but the real consequences (not to mention the actual facts) of his actions are to be determined by the relevant justice system, not the blogosphere. We, instead, are left with the task of making sense of this sickly revelation, and, with the suffering of all those affected held firmly in our minds, find a way to apply the lessons of this possibly tragic case to our own lives.
For me, the lesson of Rabbi Gafni is this: be aware. Be aware of yourself in every moment. Be aware of everyone around you. Be aware of your affect on them, of their affect on you, and so on. If you're making grand spiritual pronouncements, try your best to live up to them. If people are coming to you for spiritual consul, be as transparent as you can with what you can actually offer. If you're in the business of giving people hope, be sure your product is as solid as it can be. Otherwise, you're selling wine in tainted bottles.
In the very few encounters I've had with Reb. Gafni at public talks he's given, I've been consistently amazed with his energy, his heart, and his passion. His knowledge of Judaism, to an outsider raised Catholic, seems profound. His use of music, anecdotes, and scriptural quotation seems masterful. He seems adept at drilling to the heart of an issue, and rendering the world deeper than it usually seems.
But like everyone else, he's part animal. Like everyone else, his animalness can make him susceptible to urges and drives which can rage unchecked. And like the long, sad lineage of spiritual teachers accused, and sometimes convicted, of sexual and other improprieties, Gafni is going to have to wait for the day when the conclusion to French novelist Michel Houellebecq's The Elementary Particles is vindicated.
[For those who haven't read the amazing piece of literature in question, click here for a quick summary, or read the reviews. In short, it chronicles a pair of unhappy Boomer siblings living in late-20th century Europe, who dream and die by the longings of their sexual impulses. One lives on to fulfill a key role in the evolution of the beings who will evolve beyond homo sapiens.]
So that's where it stands: the answer to the abject human misery wrought by all men and women in positions of influence--gurus, politicians, CEOs, highly aggressive janitors, everyone else--is to be found in... posthumanity. For it is only when we can completely detach ourselves from the irrational whims of our sexuality that the human race will finally be happy. Cloning will replace reproduction, and our lives will take on the somnambulant quality of clouds floating on air.
Do you have a better idea?
Comments:
<< Home
"Given that I myself fall quite short of reaching sainthood anytime soon, I've no moral high horse to climb upon to denounce Gafni. What he's been accused of sucks, of course, but the real consequences (not to mention the actual facts) of his actions are to be determined by the relevant justice system, not the blogosphere. We, instead, are left with the task of making sense of this sickly revelation, and, with the suffering of all those affected held firmly in our minds, find a way to apply the lessons of this possibly tragic case to our own lives."
Well put. This is why I haven't mentioned it on my blog.
I also have no interest in picking apart the wording of Ken's blog post or pontificating on the larger implications for Integral. For me, it is only appropriate to reflect on what this means in my own life, and I'm choosing to do that privately; I appreciate your compassionate approach to it here.
Well put. This is why I haven't mentioned it on my blog.
I also have no interest in picking apart the wording of Ken's blog post or pontificating on the larger implications for Integral. For me, it is only appropriate to reflect on what this means in my own life, and I'm choosing to do that privately; I appreciate your compassionate approach to it here.
Are the women involved getting any kind of therapy for their experiences with the good Rabbi? There was no mention in Ken's blog for the gals abused. I mean, they were sexually abused, right?
And, why is it that he has an illness - not knowing the abuse/allegations re: perverse (hanging from chandeliers...or liking cigars...) and not a guy using bad judgement? It seems as if that is the political excuse for bad behaviour...."I'm sick," or, "the devil made me do it...." given the public personna and title.
Does being sick make it all right, or even worse - excusable? Is this in reality a free ride for him, a slap on the hand by saying "I'm sick" - re: legal issues?
I hope not - for all of our sakes - if so, then this is nothing more than a form of mental masturbation for the public figure and a miscarriage of justice for everyone.
And, why is it that he has an illness - not knowing the abuse/allegations re: perverse (hanging from chandeliers...or liking cigars...) and not a guy using bad judgement? It seems as if that is the political excuse for bad behaviour...."I'm sick," or, "the devil made me do it...." given the public personna and title.
Does being sick make it all right, or even worse - excusable? Is this in reality a free ride for him, a slap on the hand by saying "I'm sick" - re: legal issues?
I hope not - for all of our sakes - if so, then this is nothing more than a form of mental masturbation for the public figure and a miscarriage of justice for everyone.
Since I live on the ease coast, and have little or no personal interest in any of this, other than from a female viewpoint, my questions were rhetorical and not to be taken as personal statements to take further hacks at the guy.
I have no knowledge of him on a personal or professional level in any way and do not want to get into name calling. That was not my sense, just a question on political etiquette and legalities that will ultimately seem to diminish the sense of right and wrong, moral and ethical in one's behaviour, no matter who it is.
I liked most of Ken's statement, but I fail to see Rabbi Gafni continuing to be judged by what will become a tribunal for his sexual conduct in the future. I mean, how does one really and truly measure sexual health, proclivities, or even normalcy? That has got to be a really tough call - but we all know that one already! :)
I have no knowledge of him on a personal or professional level in any way and do not want to get into name calling. That was not my sense, just a question on political etiquette and legalities that will ultimately seem to diminish the sense of right and wrong, moral and ethical in one's behaviour, no matter who it is.
I liked most of Ken's statement, but I fail to see Rabbi Gafni continuing to be judged by what will become a tribunal for his sexual conduct in the future. I mean, how does one really and truly measure sexual health, proclivities, or even normalcy? That has got to be a really tough call - but we all know that one already! :)
I don't buy it. The vast majority of us aren't victimized by our pleasures and out of control. By your analysis, bank robbers' actions could be excused.
I cannot know the beast who breathes in every being's breast, but we seem always to have the capacity to control ourselves and tame our wild impulses.
Gafni has set out a path of behavior that he regrets now that he has been tagged. You seem to be trying to make your prior misconception of who Gafni is fit the evidence we now have of who Gafni really is.
Still, your punishment seems harsh. You want us all to be castrated because of Gafni's fall from the grace he should never have been granted?
I cannot know the beast who breathes in every being's breast, but we seem always to have the capacity to control ourselves and tame our wild impulses.
Gafni has set out a path of behavior that he regrets now that he has been tagged. You seem to be trying to make your prior misconception of who Gafni is fit the evidence we now have of who Gafni really is.
Still, your punishment seems harsh. You want us all to be castrated because of Gafni's fall from the grace he should never have been granted?
And furthermore, there seems to be a rather LONG history of his abuses toward women!
Check this link out -
http://theawarenesscenter.org/gafni_mordechai.html
NO EXCUSES for him in my book. There is a call to action, a call of moral and ethical action and statement we all must adhere to and follow if we want a civil and forward moving society built upon the precepts of Life, all of which include the Integral crowd.
Post a Comment
Check this link out -
http://theawarenesscenter.org/gafni_mordechai.html
NO EXCUSES for him in my book. There is a call to action, a call of moral and ethical action and statement we all must adhere to and follow if we want a civil and forward moving society built upon the precepts of Life, all of which include the Integral crowd.
<< Home

