Football Programs: Iceberg Theory
As we plunge headlong into the latter half of the American Football season (did anyone see the Canadian SuperBowl? me neither), I must admit to being attracted to the sport more in theory than in actual experience. Unless you have a really deep geographic loyalty to a team, or money placed on the outcome, or family members to cheer against, the average televised football game -- 22 grown men in saturated colors and fiberfoam padding chasing each other around a graphing calculator made of grass -- is pretty bland indeed, unless one considers what isn't being shown on the screen. The tell-tale sign is the use of the term "football program" indicative that the game being played behind the sidelines is far more important than the Spartan passion play waging its way across three hours on the field.Unlike a straightforwardly primitive sport like, say, distance running, football is something akin to a joint military maneuver, requiring untold amounts of planning, logistics, strategy, reconnaissance, support personnel, communication (verbal, non-verbal, telecomm, intuitive), PR, media ploys, recruiting, biomedical engineering, materials science, etc. before a single kick-off can take place. My question is this: why not show this on TV as well?
One argument, of course, could be realism. The TV broadcast attempts to capture the reality of being at a game, while ingoring the hidden forces which everything seen on the field in the first place. But this purported "realism" -- already on thin ice with the advent of multiple camera angles, instant reply, and onscreen stats -- came to a crashing finality with the inception of the digitally-superimposed line of scrimmage, the noosphere's final deathblow to the hegemony of the bones-n-muscle biosphere. The yellow line is the leak in the facade of the Real, the symptom of the vast iceberg of politics, economics, technology, and sheer numerology lying just below the surface of the 100-yard green.
So why stop at the yellow line? I'm advocating a complete re-thinking of the way football is presented: I want to see ALL of the competing forces -- on-field and off -- interacting all at once on my projection monitor. Let's see the play-by-play in the sports medicine trenches, let's get a molecule's-eye view of the damage being done to the muscles of a player being tackled, let's see the climatological effects of so much heat and sweat, onscreen variables debating the chemo-cognitive effects of hometown morale, virtual reality blimp tours of nearby clouds, the pigment-traced travails of sewage leaving the restrooms, the terrorized flights of worms from the playing field's surface, the stock quotes of each padding manufacturer, the estimates of gambling-fueled Mafia territory gains, the success of players vis-a-vis sideline fans in seducing opposing team cheerleaders, biological surveys of game-time vomit explusion, lines of force leading from uniform production floor to blitzed quarterback tackle....
Then, maybe, I'll watch a game.
Since moving out West I have developed a keen appreciation for horizontal depth. Back home, back East, in the landlocked towns, there is flatness, there are meandering rolling hills, we endure disorientation: zero-dimensionality, home with no reference, subject with no object. In Boulder, we navigate all directions with reference to our pole star, the Flatiron Range, always due West from any point in town. It is both a topographical and historic point of reference, a clear visual signifier for "The Wild West Starts Here", the clearest indicator anywhere in the nation of the end of one geomorphic personality (the Plains) and the beginning of another (the Rockies). It is the beginning of an adventure novel, the drop-cap opening of a block of text, the astonishing throat-clear at the commencement of a speech. For this very reason, however, Boulder is one-dimensional.
Contrast this to the Phoenix area, where I was a recent visitor. Rather than the constancy of mountains looming in the West, there are mountains and hills and abutments in every which direction, disconcertingly rising above a more or less flat valley (flatter than the Colorado Front Range at least). Multiple reference points, multiple choices, multiple geographic loyalties. It is no surprise that the area seems more ethnically heterogeneous, not to mention historically ambiguous. Lacking the grand promenade that is the Gateway to the West of Denver, and the Pacific finality of the California coastline, Arizona, like the rest of the Southwest, is both an in-between zone, and a scenic destination (although, if the late Bill Hicks gets his way, and CA topples at the hands of an earthquake, AZ will be home to miles and miles of beachfront property).

Can't get enough of 




Intelligent men 26 pixels tall march from North to Southwest on your 17-inch flat screen, real-room buzzes go unacknowledged as your gaze locks into this tiny logicial competition world you've volunteered your time into. Curiously, a similar process occurs inside your own sub-6' body as you click click shift click, other little micronauts duel it out for space, brainware, mindshare, arms and legs and cavities and cracks and vessels and avenues and alleys... BOMBARD your inner circuits with the things you love most, the artillery of shared splendors, mutual accomplishments and lightly-held achievement, tasting the peache-breezes as the they flutter the sails of your navies, your navies, your navies...
